---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper#: 

Title:  
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ratings

 Rating Category    Your Rating       Scale Definition
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Evaluation of work              5=Excellent work and a major contribution
and contribution     |-----|    4=Good solid work of some importance
                     |     |    3=Solid work but marginal contribution
                     |-----|    2=Marginal work and very minor contribution
                                1=Very questionable work and contribution
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originality                     5=Trailblazing
novelty              |-----|    4=A pioneering piece of work
                     |     |    3=One step ahead of the pack
                     |-----|    2=YAPA (yet another paper about...)
                                1=It's been said many times before
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Relevance to the                5=Right on target
call for papers      |-----|    4=Definitely relevant
                     |     |    3=Close enough
                     |-----|    2=Not really appropriate for SIGCOMM '95
                                1=Definitely inappropriate for SIGCOMM '95
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Readability and                 5=Very good
organization         |-----|    4=Basically well written
                     |     |    3=Readable
                     |-----|    2=Needs considerable work
                                1=Unacceptably bad
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Overall                         5=Definitely accept (very high quality)
recommendation       |-----|    4=Accept (good quality)
                     |     |    3=Accept if room (marginal quality)
                     |-----|    2=Likely reject (low quality)
                                1=Definitely reject (has no merit)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments (to be returned to the author(s))
[Comment on strengths and weaknesses of the paper; note any ways you
think the paper could be improved.]

{use as many lines here as you need}

%%  {please do not remove this line}
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary
[Please summarize the paper in your own words and very few sentences.
These comments will be used by the Program Committee during the final
review.]

{use as many lines here as you need}

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Confidential comments
[Comments on this paper for the Program Committee (to be withheld from the
author(S)).  Please include here any comments about why the paper should be
accepted or rejected.

{use as many lines here as you need}

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
$$ {please do not remove this line nor add lines after it}